Generate SBTi targets
Create an SBTi target pathway automatically from the governed baseline, scope coverage and target year.
Target setting and emission reduction for teams in the United States.
Set targets, model reduction initiatives and compare pathways against the corporate footprint—so teams in the United States can see which choices move the trajectory.
United StatesBook demo nowScenariosGroup pathway · 2025–2030
2 initiatives activeModelled 2030 emissions190.7 ktCO₂e
Gap to target59.7 ktCO₂e
Business as usualSelected pathwayTarget
Width = abatement potentialHeight = marginal cost
Build initiatives
Turn reduction ideas into initiatives with timing, ownership and calculation assumptions.
Compare scenarios
Group initiatives into pathways and model their effect on the corporate footprint.
Track progress
Compare measured emissions with the pathway as underlying impact data changes.
Trusted by fashion and retail teams
Start with the hotspot, not the idea list.
Use the measured footprint to locate the sources that matter most, then connect each hotspot to a reduction initiative your teams and suppliers can actually own.
Footprint to action2025 baseline
4 hotspots mappedPurchased goodsMaterials and manufacturing
63%Supplier energyElectricity and thermal energy
18%Stores and officesPurchased electricity
9%LogisticsUpstream and downstream freight
6%Turn reduction ideas into initiatives the model can use.
Define where an initiative applies, when it begins and which assumptions drive its estimated effect. Keep owners and source context with the action.
Initiative portfolioCurrent planning cycle
Scroll horizontally to inspect all initiative fields.
Supplier thermal efficiencyScope 3
Sourcing + suppliers202731.6 ktCO₂eReady to modelLower-carbon material mixScope 3
Product + sourcing202836.9 ktCO₂eAssumptions setRenewable electricityScope 2
Retail operations202618.4 ktCO₂eIn pathwayMaterial transition programmeScope 3
Product + sourcing202836.9 ktCO₂eAdded to pathwayPut cost beside carbon before sourcing commits.
Give sourcing teams the abatement potential and marginal cost of each initiative in the same decision view. When energy, operating, production and price inputs are available, Carbon Trail can calculate initiative cost automatically; teams can review or add assumptions where inputs are incomplete.
One prioritisation basisCompare carbon impact, cost and calculation provenance without moving the plan into a separate spreadsheet.
Cost + abatement portfolioSelected planning scenario
86.9 ktCO₂e potentialScroll horizontally to inspect cost and abatement fields.
Renewable electricityStores and offices
18.4 ktCO₂e−£12/tCO₂eEnergy contractsAuto-calculatedSupplier thermal efficiencyWet-processing facilities
31.6 ktCO₂e£18/tCO₂eEnergy + capexAuto-calculatedLower-carbon material mixPriority products
36.9 ktCO₂e£46/tCO₂eMaterial price inputsAssumptions reviewedCompare pathways before choosing one.
Group initiatives into scenarios and compare each trajectory with business as usual and the 2030 target. Every scenario shows both its projected reduction and any remaining shortfall to the target.
- Compare initiative combinations on one basis
- See the estimated change and remaining target gap
- Keep assumptions attached to each pathway
2030 pathway comparisonSame 2025 baseline
Target: 131.0 ktCO₂eScroll horizontally to compare every scenario field.
Business as usual
No initiatives240.7 ktCO₂e+10%Operational action
Energy + efficiency190.7 ktCO₂e−13%Full transition
Energy + efficiency + materials153.8 ktCO₂e−30%2030 target
Required pathway131.0 ktCO₂e−40%Stress-test how much of the plan lands.
Scenario variants apply different achievement rates to the same initiatives, so the team can see the consequence of delivery risk without rebuilding the pathway.
- Optimistic
- 100% achievement
- Baseline
- 80% achievement
- Pessimistic
- 60% achievement
Achievement sensitivityFull transition scenario · 2025–2030
Same initiatives, three outcomesScroll horizontally to compare all three variant curves.
A reduction plan is only as useful as the data beneath it.
Connect the pathway to the footprint, product and supplier records that explain what changed.
Reduction scenarioTarget · initiatives · assumptionsOne governed pathway
The same product workflow, adapted for the United States.
Keep one governed source of product and emissions data, then apply the national market context your team needs. Requirements can change without fragmenting the calculation or evidence beneath them.
United States market viewNational scope
Shared product workflowDecarbonisationProduct · supplier · evidence
United States
Textile laws and regulations in the United States
Track current fashion and retail regulation updates across the United States and understand what they may mean for your brand.
Decarbonisation questions for United States
Common questions from fashion and retail teams planning emissions reductions in United States.
Request a DemoWhat is decarbonisation software?
Decarbonisation software is emerging as a critical tool for fashion retail to effectively manage their environmental impact and transition towards achieving a net-zero future. The advanced platforms are using AI to automate repetitive tasks, build advanced scenario models, and generate recommendations for the most impactful and low-cost climate initiatives.
What are the five pillars of decarbonisation in Apparel & Footwear?
A Decarbonisation program is a structured plan aimed at reducing corporate greenhouse gas emissions, particularly carbon dioxide, within a fashion brand or retailer. Most effective decarbonisation plans require close collaboration with textile manufacturers, climate investors or institutional funds, and internal stakeholders. For more details, read our blog on decarbonisation.
What is a decarbonisation program for a brand in the United States?
A Decarbonisation program is a structured plan aimed at reducing corporate greenhouse gas emissions, particularly carbon dioxide, within a fashion brand or retailer. Most effective decarbonisation plans require close collaboration with textile manufacturers, climate investors or institutional funds, and internal stakeholders. For more details, read our blog on decarbonisation.
What is an example of decarbonisation in the US fashion industry?
Dyeing in textile industry is an energy and water intensive process, leading to high emissions. Patagonia switched to "solution dyeing" for selected products. This technique can achieve up to 95% reduction in GHG emissions compared to conventional dyeing
Which industry is hardest to decarbonise in the United States?
While typical industries like Steel, Cement and Petroleum are the hardest industries to decarbonise in the United States, the fashion industry also posses a significant challenge with the rise of fast fashion and lack of recycling/waste management programs.