One evidence base for CSRD, SB 253, AGEC and ESPR.

Connect governed company, product and supplier data to reporting and product-disclosure requirements across CSRD/ESRS, CDP, California SB 253, French AGEC, ESPR and DPP programmes. See gaps, assign work and prepare reviewable outputs.

Talk to our team
Requirement controlSample data · Autumn 2026 reporting workspace
Evidence register connected

Scroll horizontally to inspect every requirement field.

RequirementGoverned sourceStatus
GHG inventoryCorporate carbon accountingEvidence linked
Energy consumption and mixOperations recordsEvidence linked
Climate transition planDecarbonisation pathwayReview due
Value-chain metricsSupplier evidence3 gaps
Requirement set last reviewed 08 Sep 2026Sources remain inspectable

Map requirements

Translate each framework into a requirement set your team can inspect.

Connect evidence

Reuse governed company, product and supplier records across reporting routes.

Assign gaps

Keep missing evidence visible with an owner, status and reporting period.

Prepare outputs

Build reviewable disclosures and product information from approved data.

Trusted by fashion and retail teams

Calida
Deichmann
PDS Limited
Voice
Arvind
MAS Holdings
Asmara
Giltex
Sealand
Enviu
Virgio
Mira

One source record. Several reporting routes.

Map approved records once, then reuse them wherever a corporate disclosure or product requirement asks for the same evidence.

Shared evidence register143 approved recordsSource · Period · Methodology · Reviewer
CompanyProductSupplier
Requirement routes
CSRD / ESRSMapped
CDPMapped
SB 253Mapped
AGEC + DPPMapped

See every gap before it becomes a reporting problem.

Keep incomplete evidence visible, assign the next action and follow it into review without losing the requirement or source context.

3items need
attention
Evidence gap registerSample data · Current reporting workspace
3 items need attention

Scroll horizontally to inspect every requirement field.

Supplier energy evidenceCSRD · E1
12 priority facilitiesUnassigned14 Oct
Scope 3 methodology noteSB 253
Corporate inventorySustainability21 OctIn review
Recyclability evidenceAGEC
46 productsProduct compliance28 OctCollecting
Transition plan narrativeCSRD · E1
2030 pathwaySustainability04 NovEvidence linked
Requirement and source context retainedEvery change stays reviewable

Build reporting outputs from governed data, not duplicate entry.

Use approved metrics and evidence to populate applicable reporting fields. Keep the source, methodology and reviewer attached while your team completes narratives and sign-off.

  • Pre-fill applicable quantitative fields from approved records
  • Retain evidence links and calculation provenance
  • Export a review package without replacing human approval
ESRS E1 · Climate changeSample data · FY 2026 reporting package
Review in progress

Scroll horizontally to inspect every reporting field.

84% ready
Gross Scope 1 emissionsCorporate inventory · Approved
12,480 tCO₂eLinked
Gross market-based Scope 2Corporate inventory · Approved
8,920 tCO₂eLinked
Gross Scope 3 emissionsInventory · Supplier records pending
197,004 tCO₂eReview
Transition plan narrative2030 scenario pathway
Source attachedDraft
4 source records attached

Corporate disclosures and product requirements, one evidence model.

Use a shared control layer while keeping each framework’s scope, source and review path distinct.

Applicability and interpretation remain with your organisation and its legal or assurance advisers.

Controls your team can put behind the reporting process.

Platform securityISO 27001:2022Certified information security management
Platform securitySOC 2 Type IICertified operating controls
Methodology assuranceGHG Protocol · PEFCR Apparel & Footwear · ISO 14067Carbon Trail’s methodology has been independently assured against these standards.

Compliance starts with the records behind it.

Keep the reporting layer connected to the workflows that create company, product and supplier evidence.

Carbon accountingScope 1, 2 and 3 inventoryProduct LCAImpact and material recordsPrimary supplier dataFacility activity and evidence

Questions about compliance workflows?

See how Carbon Trail connects evidence, requirements and review without obscuring who owns interpretation and approval.

Talk to our team
Does Carbon Trail guarantee regulatory compliance?

No. Carbon Trail supports the data, evidence, review and reporting workflows behind compliance work. Your organisation and its legal or assurance advisers remain responsible for interpreting applicable requirements and approving disclosures.

Which requirements can teams manage?

Teams can organise corporate and product reporting work across frameworks such as CSRD and ESRS, CDP, California SB 253, AASB, French AGEC, PEF and OEF, and Digital Product Passport programmes. The requirements that apply depend on your business, products, locations and reporting period.

Can the same evidence be reused across frameworks?

Yes. A governed record can be mapped to more than one requirement, so teams can reuse approved company, product and supplier data without duplicating the underlying evidence.

How are missing records managed?

Missing or incomplete evidence can remain visible as a gap with a source, owner, due date and review status. Teams can follow the gap through collection and approval.

Can Carbon Trail prepare reporting outputs automatically?

Carbon Trail can use approved data to populate applicable reporting fields and prepare reviewable outputs. Teams retain control over narrative responses, assumptions, review and final submission.

How do product requirements connect to corporate reporting?

Both can use the same governed evidence model. Product composition, supplier and life-cycle records can support product-level requirements while aggregated activity and emissions data support corporate disclosures.

How is the platform secured and assured?

Carbon Trail is ISO 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type II certified. Its methodology has been independently assured against the GHG Protocol, PEFCR Apparel & Footwear, and ISO 14067.