Carbon Trail

Carbon Trail Logo

Carbon-neutral vs Net Zero – What’s the Difference?

Climate Change appears to be a top concern for humanity at the moment. This is due to the rise in greenhouse gases (GHG) in the atmosphere, which is mainly due to human activities like burning fossil fuels, deforestation, and industrial processes. Gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O), trap heat in the atmosphere, leading to global warming.

Terms like “carbon-neutral” and “net zero” are often used when we talk about reducing emissions. While both these terms involve balancing emitted GHGs with avoided or removed emissions, the key difference lies in the compensated emissions, that is offsets. 

What is Carbon-Neutral?  

The concept of carbon neutrality revolves around balancing out the CO2 emissions we emit in the atmosphere, either by reducing them or offsetting them with an equal amount of reduced emissions. The aim here is to achieve a net-zero carbon footprint. There are various strategies to achieve this, including investing in renewable energy, enhancing energy efficiency, and buying carbon offsets. 

These strategies have helped Google to make significant progress in global renewable energy projects. They have signed power purchase agreements (PPAs) with wind and solar farms to secure a steady source of clean energy. They have also invested in carbon offset programs such as methane capture from landfills and improved forest management. 

Carbon Neutrality is achieved when the net amount of carbon dioxide emissions produced by an entity (such as a company, organization, or individual) is balanced by an equivalent number of emissions removed or offset. This implies that with every ton of CO2 produced, an equal amount is either reduced or offset, resulting in a carbon footprint of zero. 

Achieving carbon neutrality is a two-part plan: cutting down on emissions as much as possible and offsetting any remaining emissions through various methods. The goal is to ensure that entities do not add any additional emissions to atmospheric CO2 levels.

Origin

Carbon neutrality came into the picture as a part of a larger environmental movement in the early 2000s. It arose when businesses and governments recognized the importance of addressing their carbon emissions and reducing their effects on climate change. 

Emission Balancing 

Equalizing emissions is a process that involves measuring the overall carbon emissions generated and then taking steps to balance out these emissions through equivalent reductions or offsets. This is possible through various methods like investing in renewable energy projects, enhancing energy efficiency, and purchasing carbon credits. 

What is Net Zero? 

Net Zero raises the bar by aiming to reduce all man-made greenhouse gas emissions in every industry. It helps reduce emissions as much as possible and balance any remaining emissions with removal or offset measures. The focus is to reduce significantly before considering offsets. Key strategies to achieve net zero include transitioning to renewable energy, enhancing energy efficiency, carbon capture and storage (CCS), reforestation, and innovating new technologies. 

It was introduced in the Science-Based Target Initiative’s Corporate Net-Zero Standard

Apple is working on making products using only recycled or renewable materials, using a closed-loop supply chain. Their solar and wind farms globally contribute to their goal of achieving 100% renewable energy across their supply chain. 

Net zero involves striking a harmony between the greenhouse gas emissions generated and those removed from the atmosphere. The aim is to reduce emissions as much as possible, and then compensate for the remaining emissions using methods like carbon capture and storage or natural processes such as reforestation. It aims to eliminate all human-caused greenhouse gas emissions. This involves reducing emissions across all sectors, including energy, transportation, industry, and agriculture, until the remaining emissions can be offset. 

A key principle of net zero involves reducing significant emissions before opting for offsets. This ensures that the efforts prioritize actual carbon emission reduction through significant practices and technologies, rather than just compensating for high emissions with offsets. The option of offsets should only be used when it’s difficult to eliminate the emissions entirely. 

Origin 

The idea of net zero is rooted in scientific research and climate policy, especially aimed at reducing global warming. It became widely recognized after the Paris Agreement was adopted in 2015. 

Alignment with Global Standards  

The concepts of Carbon Neutrality and Net Zero work in accordance with global standards such as the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol, which provides a detailed framework for measuring and managing GHG emissions. It is a globally adopted accounting tool for understanding, quantifying, and managing GHG emissions. 

Both carbon neutrality and net zero also work in favor of the goals of the Paris Agreement. This agreement aims to limit global warming to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels, with efforts to limit the increase to 1.5°C. 

Achieving Carbon Neutrality 

Renewable Energy 

Companies can minimize their carbon emissions by shifting from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal power, contributing to a greener energy grid. To ensure that the power used is sourced from renewable projects, companies also enter into power purchase agreements (PPAs). 

Energy Efficiency 

Companies can enhance energy efficiency by installing LED lighting, energy-efficient HVAC systems, and smart meters to monitor and manage energy use. Optimizing heating and cooling schedules, improving insulation, and using energy-efficient appliances can help reduce costs.  

Carbon Offsets 

Companies can purchase carbon credits from projects that reduce or seize emissions elsewhere. These projects can include reforestation, methane capture, renewable energy installations, and more. Each credit represents the reduction of one ton of CO2. 

Sustainable Practices 

Circular economy practices like reducing waste, recycling materials, and designing products that are durable and can be reused, can help achieve carbon neutrality. Collaboration with suppliers to implement sustainable practices across the entire value chain is crucial. 

Carbon Neutrality Examples  

Google 

Google completed our first carbon removal credit offtake deals through Frontier in 2023, including deals with Charm Industrial, CarbonCapture, and Lithos Carbon. They have maintained seven consecutive years of 100% renewable energy matching on a global and annual basis. 

Google’s data centers are 1.8 times more energy-efficient than typical data centers. They have achieved a fleet-wide Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) of 1.12 or lower since 2012. 

Microsoft  

In 2021, Microsoft made the world’s largest purchase of carbon removal, totaling 1.4 million metric tons, and aims to exceed this by procuring 1.5 million metric tons in the next fiscal year​. They are also committed to eliminating its dependency on diesel fuel for backup power in data centers by 2030. 

Microsoft is on track to power its data centers with 100% renewable energy by 2025. 

Achieving Net Zero 

Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS)

Carbon Capture can be implemented in ways such as chemical absorption, adsorption, and membrane separation. The captured CO2 can be utilized in different industrial processes such as enhancing oil recovery and producing synthetic fuels. To avoid captured CO2 from going back to the atmosphere, it is important to have long-term storage solutions like geological sequestration. 

Electrification of Transportation 

As of 2020, the global electric vehicle industry is experiencing rapid growth, boasting over 10 million electric cars on the streets. To support the global adoption of EV vehicles, it is important to set up charging stations. 

Nature-Based Solutions

Planting trees on degraded land can seize huge amounts of CO2. For example, the Bonn Challenge aims to restore 350 million hectares by 2030, potentially sequestering up to 1.7 gigatonnes of CO2 annually​. 

Digital Innovations 

IoT and AI can optimize industrial processes, monitor emissions in real time, and improve energy management. Smart grid technology boosts the efficiency and reliability of electricity distribution, allowing for greater integration of renewable energy.

What is the Difference Between Carbon-Neutral and Net Zero?  

Aspect Carbon Neutral Net Zero
Conceptual Differences Balancing Eliminating
Emission Approach Focus on compensating for emissions through offsets after they are produced. Focus on eliminating emissions with minimal reliance on offsets.
Practical Differences Temporary Solutions Long-term Transformation
Duration of Impact Often relies on short-term solutions, like annual carbon offset purchases, which need to be renewed regularly. Aims for permanent solutions that transform operations to be inherently low or zero emissions, requiring fewer offsets over time.
Implementation Strategies Common methods include investing in renewable energy certificates, reforestation projects, and purchasing carbon credits. Requires detailed changes such as adopting renewable energy, enhancing energy efficiency, implementing carbon capture technologies, and overhauling industrial processes.
Policy Implications
Regulatory Focus Often led by voluntary commitments or corporate social responsibility initiatives, with some regulatory incentives. Increasingly becoming a regulatory requirement in many jurisdictions, with stringent targets and penalties for non-compliance.
Reporting Standards May involve self-reported data with less rigorous verification in some cases. Generally requires detailed reporting and third-party verification to ensure transparency and accountability.
Comparative Summary Main Points of Divergence
Primary Goal Offset existing emissions to achieve a neutral balance. Achieve zero emissions through significant reductions and only offset residual emissions.
Long-term Viability Provides a pathway to mitigate climate impact but can be seen as a stopgap measure. Represents a more sustainable and comprehensive approach to addressing climate change.

Examples of Companies Achieving Carbon Neutrality 

Apple 

Apple is a prominent technology company committed to environmental sustainability. The goal is to reach carbon neutrality across their supply chain and product life cycle by 2030. 

Reduction and Offsetting Strategies  

Apple runs all its global operations with 100% renewable energy. In 2022, Apple achieved over 13.7 gigawatts of renewable electricity across its global supply chain. Through its Supplier Clean Energy Program, Apple got over 250 suppliers to transition to renewable energy, preventing over 17.4 million metric tons of carbon emissions annually.

Apple’s product design has time and again proved to be energy-efficient, using recycled materials. The use of 100% recycled aluminum in MacBook Air enclosures reduces emissions by nearly 50% compared to earlier practices. They have reduced their carbon footprint by 45% as compared to 2015 while growing their revenue by over 68%.  

IKEA

IKEA aims to be climate-positive by 2030, focusing on reducing more greenhouse gas emissions than its value chain emits. 

Reduction and Offsetting Strategies

IKEA has increased the use of renewable energy in its practices, with 25 markets using 100% renewable electricity in 2023. They are also working toward reducing their greenhouse gas emissions by half by 2030, compared to 2016 levels, and have introduced bio-based glue in board materials. 

They are constantly innovating with their product designs like tableware using internal factory waste and improved energy efficiency in its lighting range. In FY23, IKEA reduced its total greenhouse gas emissions by 12% compared to FY22 and by 22% compared to FY16. 

Patagonia 

Patagonia is committed to being carbon neutral by 2025 through comprehensive strategies addressing its entire value chain. 

Reduction and Offsetting Strategies 

Patagonia invests in regenerative organic farming practices, which help trap carbon in the soil and reduce emissions from agriculture. They also encourage agricultural practices like cover crops, intercropping, crop rotation, etc. 

It sources 100% renewable electricity for its operations and supports renewable energy projects in its supply chain. It also focuses on the durability and repairability of its products to extend their lifecycle, reducing the need for new production and lowering the overall carbon footprint. 


Conclusion  

To effectively add to global climate goals, businesses must make use of advanced technologies and innovative industrial operations. This detailed approach not only aligns with global standards like the Greenhouse Gas Protocol but also determines the pivotal role of corporate responsibility in leading significant environmental change.

At Carbon Trail, we aid fashion brands in their journey towards carbon neutrality by streamlining the product lifecycle assessment (LCA) process for fashion products, adhering to the upcoming  Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCR) for Apparel & Footwear and the ISO 14067 standard. Through this structured and comprehensive LCA, brands can recognize and tackle high-impact areas, and help them make quick decisions to reduce their carbon footprints. 

By prioritizing high-impact, easy-to-implement initiatives, and using scenario modeling to estimate and prioritize decarbonization efforts, companies can strategically enhance their contributions to a sustainable future.

Picture of Manyata Rai

Manyata Rai

Picture this: armed with a notepad and a pen (or perhaps a laptop because we're in the 21st century), I devour books, binge-watch movies, and rock out to music—all while writing about everything under the sun. Pursuing journalism and mass comm, with more caffeine and Kishore Kumar to keep me up.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may also like

Social Cost of Carbon: What Is It, and How to Calculate It?

What is the Social Cost of Carbon? 

The Social Cost of Carbon (SCC) refers to the cost applied to every additional ton of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) released into the atmosphere. This way, companies can estimate the impact of the rise in CO2 emissions. It is crucial to do so as CO2 majorly affects agriculture, human health, and the environment.

Role of SCC in Climate Economics and Policy 

The SCC helps in shaping climate economics and policy. This is done by offering a stable way to showcase the importance of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Governments and organizations usually benefit from using this metric. They can support their decisions on environmental regulation and climate action with the help of SCC. 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) makes use of SCC calculations to figure out how effective emission reduction policies are, in terms of cost. The EPA also uses it to work on regulations that aim to cut down emissions. Policymakers can understand the economic impact of CO2 emissions with the help of SCC. This way, they can also make informed decisions to combat climate change. 

Historical Background and Development 

The Social Cost of Carbon has grown tremendously since its beginning. Earlier, Researchers made use of SCC to estimate the potential impacts of CO₂ emissions. Over time, we have seen SCC becoming important in policymaking. Today, it is a crucial way to assess the economic impact of emission reduction plans. 

Some of the key milestones involve the setting up of the Interagency Working Group (IWG) on the Social Cost of Carbon in the United States in 2009. This group came up with the first detailed estimates of SCC. Since then, it has been updated and revised. The 2010 report by IWG offered a baseline to measure SCC. This has been used in various regulatory and policy setups. 

Why is the Social Cost of Carbon Important?

Impact on Environmental Regulations and Carbon Pricing 

The Social Cost of Carbon (SCC) develops environmental regulations and carbon pricing plans. It is a standard for carbon pricing by attaching a value to the damage caused by the release of each ton of carbon dioxide (CO2). This helps ensure that the emissions cost shows the real environmental impact. It motivates companies to reduce their carbon emissions. 

Carbon taxes and cap-and-trade systems often make use of SCC to decide the cost per ton of CO₂. A higher SCC means a higher carbon price, and this gets the company to invest in cleaner technologies for a stronger incentive. Carbon emissions must be accurately priced to incentivize the shift to a low-carbon economy.

Influence on Public Policy and Economic Decisions 

The SCC also has a huge impact on public policy and economic decisions. This is because governments make use of SCC to evaluate the economic feasibility of emission reduction regulations and policies. When policymakers assess an environmental regulation, they utilize SCC to compare the benefits and costs of that regulation. It is to be noted that if its benefits are more than the impending costs, the regulation can be implemented. 

This is how the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) makes use of SCC to support emission limits on power plants and vehicles. These regulations help combat climate change by minimizing carbon emissions and leading to eventual environmental and economic stability. 

The Social Cost of Carbon in Climate Change Mitigation

Assessing the Long-Term Benefits of Reducing Emissions 

The SCC is a crucial tool to evaluate the long-term benefits of reducing emissions. They help governments and businesses measure the eventual harm that can be avoided by reducing emissions. This can help them make better decisions as to where to invest when it comes to climate change solutions. This may include investing in renewable energy projects, boosting energy efficiency, and supporting reforestation efforts.

Integration with Global Efforts to Combat Climate Change 

The SCC has been merged into global initiatives directed at mitigating climate change. It aligns with international climate agreements like the Paris Agreement. This is because SCC helps countries set targets to reduce emissions by offering a clear and compatible way to measure the impact of these emissions. It also helps in building global carbon markets. These global markets allow for the exchange of carbon credits to achieve emission reduction goals more effectively. 

For an in-depth understanding of carbon credits, explore our blog on What are Carbon Credits and how do they work? 

The Social Cost of Carbon (SCC) is vital for global climate policy because it shows the cost of inaction versus better climate action. 

How is the Social Cost of Carbon Calculated?

Overview of Methodologies

The Social Cost of Carbon (SCC) is measured by gauging the damage caused by the release of an additional ton of CO2 into the atmosphere. These calculations are done through complex models that merge climate science, economics, and policy analysis. A common approach here is the use of Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs). These models combine data on CO₂ emissions, climate change impacts, and economic costs to measure the SCC.

Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs)

IAMs are advanced tools that help businesses understand how carbon emissions affect global temperature and the economy. These models consider different factors like greenhouse gas levels, the impact of these gases on temperature, and how they affect economic welfare and human well-being. 

IAMs typically start with a baseline scenario of future CO₂ emissions. They evaluate how these emissions could affect global temperatures, GDP, and consumption. The SCC is measured by figuring out the present value of expected economic damages from adding one more ton of CO2. This is done using a selected discount rate.  

Source - RFF 

Key Factors in Calculating the Social Cost of Carbon

Discount Rates, Climate Sensitivity, and Damage Functions

  • Discount Rates: The discount rate is an important factor, as it determines how future damages are measured in today’s terms. A lower discount rate determines a higher value for future damages. This further results in higher SCC. On the contrary, a higher discount rate reduces the SCC. The selection of a discount rate usually sparks a debate about ethical views on future generations’ worth. 

The Interagency Working Group (IWG) in the U.S. generally uses a discount rate of 3%. However, there’s a lot of back-and-forth on this issue. The discount rates can go from as low as 1% to as high as 7%. 

SCC Estimates in the year 2020; Source - RFF

  • Climate Sensitivity: This means the maximum level of rise in global temperatures due to increased CO2 levels. If the climate sensitivity is high, it means a temperature increase for a set level of emissions. This also leads to higher SCC estimates. Variations in climate sensitivity are one of the prime reasons behind fluctuations in SCC estimates.  
  • Damage Functions: These functions measure the dynamic relationship between temperature changes and their effect on the economy. They express the physical effects of climate change on economic values. It is challenging to predict the long-term economic effects of climate change. Hence, these functions are usually uncertain.  

Consideration of Different Socioeconomic Scenarios 

SSC calculations also consider various socioeconomic scenarios. These include assumptions about future population growth, economic development, and technological advancements. These scenarios allow companies to take a glance at the possible outcomes. It shows everything from low to high emission paths. This way, policymakers can understand how SCC could change based on different future conditions. 

Challenges in Calculating the Social Cost of Carbon

Uncertainties in Predicting Future Climate Impacts

One of the most challenging parts of calculating the SCC remains the uncertainty revolving around future climate impacts. Businesses cannot pretend how climate change will affect economies and ecosystems eventually. Moreover, factors like technological advancements, policy changes, and unexpected climate events make it more complex. 

Hence, SCC estimates can be very different depending on the models and assumptions used. 

Ethical Considerations in Determining Discount Rates 

The selection of discount rates includes ethical considerations beyond any technicalities. A lower discount rate showcases that future generations should be measured equally with the present. This also results in a higher SCC. Similarly, a low discount rate means that we should prioritize our present over the future. It also reflects a lower SCC. 

The ethical aspect really matters because it impacts how we balance climate action today along with the health of future generations. 

Applications and Implications of the Social Cost of Carbon

Use in Policy-Making and Regulation

How Governments and Organizations Use the Social Cost of Carbon in Decision-Making

The Social Cost of Carbon (SCC) is a crucial tool in building up environmental policies and regulations. Governments make use of SCC calculations to assess the economic impact of carbon emissions. It is also used to support decisions on setting carbon prices, implementing taxes, and regulating emissions. SCC helps policymakers decide whether the costs behind emission reduction initiatives are worth it. They do this by measuring the economic harm related to each ton of CO₂ released. 

The U.S. government makes use of SCC to evaluate the benefits of regulations for limiting emissions. This way, the government can weigh the eventual benefits of reducing emissions against the urgent costs of implementing such regulations.

Examples of Policies Influenced by Social Cost of Carbon Estimates 

  • Clean Power Plan (USA): SCC makes it easier to emphasize on financial advantages of reducing CO2 emissions from power plants. This results in the enforcement of stringent emission rules. 
  • Fuel Efficiency Standards (USA): The SCC helped understand the eventual advantages of boosting vehicle fuel efficiency. This resulted in the adoption of stricter fuel economy standards.
  • Carbon Pricing Initiatives (Global): Countries like Canada and the UK have made use of SCC calculations to set carbon prices. It is done by making sure that carbon prices are a mirror of the actual cost of emissions to society. 

The Social Cost of Carbon in Corporate Strategy

Incorporation into Corporate Sustainability and ESG Practices 

Companies have rapidly started merging SCC into their sustainability plans and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices. Companies can easily evaluate the economic risks and opportunities concerning their carbon footprint with the use of SCC. 

This way, companies can make informed choices regarding emissions reduction. It can also help businesses invest in renewable energy, and boost energy efficiency.

Case Studies of Companies Using the Social Cost of Carbon for Strategic Planning

  • Microsoft: Microsoft is making use of an internal carbon pricing strategy based on the SCC to minimize its emissions and work towards carbon neutrality. This internal price on carbon fosters investment in energy efficiency, renewable energy, and carbon offset projects. This helps in ensuring that the company’s operations are in line with their sustainability goals. 
  • Unilever: The company makes use of SCC to evaluate the economic effect of carbon emissions across its supply chain. This way, Unilever focuses on its emission reduction plans and modifies its business strategy to align with global climate goals. 
  • Shell: Shell has utilized SCC to make informed investment decisions. They were especially focused on evaluating the long-term potential of fossil fuel projects and shifting to renewable energy. 

Future Directions and Controversies

Debates Surrounding the Social Cost of Carbon

Criticisms and Alternative Approaches to Calculating the Social Cost of Carbon

Naturally, SCC has sparked a debate as to how it makes use of complex models and uncertain data. This further results in varying calculations. Different models have different assumptions for climate sensitivity, economic growth, and damage functions, which results in a broad range of SCC estimates. 

For this, Researchers are pushing the idea of using localized data and discount rates to boost the accuracy of SCC estimates. Additionally, it’s important to constantly refine the models by updating economic projections. It also involves the integration of the latest scientific data on climate change impacts. 

The Role of SCC in Global Climate Goals 

Policymakers can utilize SCC to evaluate the costs and other implications of climate goals by assigning a monetary value to carbon emissions. This will help set up relevant carbon pricing mechanisms and emission reduction plans. Governments and businesses are encouraged to reduce emissions by showing them the cost of inaction. 

Global standards and agreements also play a huge part in the creation of standardized SCC estimates. Their collaborative efforts can shape countries to set and achieve their climate targets. This can be facilitated by the integration of the SCC into international climate frameworks. 

Conclusion

The SCC is turning into an essential resource to understand and work on the environmental impact of carbon emissions. It provides a clear economic gauge of the damage from CO2. This leads to the setting up of efficient climate policies and sustainability targets. As the significance of reducing emissions keeps on growing stronger, SCC will always stay relevant in driving decision-making and policy development. 

Companies must begin incorporating SCC into their operations to get a clear picture of their economic implications. Tools like Carbon Trail’s scenario modeling and decarbonization tool enable businesses to define an internal carbon price, set emission reduction targets, and simulate the impact of carbon-cutting initiatives. This helps them identify the most effective pathways to achieve net-zero goals, leading to more informed and efficient climate actions.

Manyata Rai September 14, 2024
0

What is an Emission Factor? – Importance, Challenges & Examples

What is an Emission Factor?   An emission factor provides you with a value to calculate the amount of a specific pollutant released into the atmosphere. It lets you know the

Manyata Rai September 12, 2024
0

Environmental Product Declaration: What is an EPD?

What is an Environmental Product Declaration?  An Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) is a uniform document that provides clear and verified information about a product’s environmental impact throughout its lifecycle. It

Manyata Rai September 10, 2024
0

The 10 Best Carbon Accounting Software in 2024

Carbon accounting software will be very essential in 2024, given that companies are slowly becoming eco-conscious, and so are the consumers. The software will help businesses identify ways they can

Manyata Rai September 8, 2024
0