As environmental consciousness becomes more prevalent, many customers are opting for sustainable options. This shift in consumer behavior has caused a surge in advertising and marketing efforts emphasizing the environmental impact of products and services. However, not all claims of sustainability are as honest as they seem.
In a report released by the European Commission in 2020, it was found that 42% of environmental claims made online were either exaggerated, false, or deceptive. This is where the concept of greenwashing comes into play.
Greenwashing stats for the year 2023; Source – The Sustainable Agency
Understanding Greenwashing
Greenwashing is a sneaky tactic used by companies to make their products or services seem more eco-friendly than they really are. This is done through misleading marketing strategies to appeal to environmentally conscious consumers.
Companies resort to greenwashing to capitalize on the rising popularity of environmentally friendly products. Greenwashing also occurs when companies emphasize on the sustainable aspect of a product to divert the audience’s attention from the company’s contribution to environmentally detrimental practices.
Back in 1986, Jay Westerveld, an environmentalist, came up with the term “greenwashing” to talk about how hotels would ask guests to “reuse” towels under the guise of sustainability when really they just wanted to cut costs. Greenwashing is basically a PR strategy, creating an illusion that is of favorable to the companies.
What is the Difference Between Greenwashing and Green Marketing?
Greenwashing and green marketing are different in their purpose and practice. Greenwashing can be defined as the act of making outrageous and even false statements regarding sustainability issues, to manipulate the customer. For example, a firm can brand their products as ‘organic’ or ‘green’ without substantiation or concerning themselves with their effects on the environment.
In contrast, green marketing refers to the honest and transparent promotion of genuinely sustainable practices and products. It is noteworthy that businesses in green marketing give definite assertions, proofs, and statistical data regarding their environmental activities. That’s why Patagonia, a brand that focuses on making its products long-lasting, repairable, and using resources transparently, is an example of green marketing.
10 Examples of Greenwashing
Greenwashing takes place across various industries, with some prominent brands involved in the practice of greenwashing.
Automobile Industry
In the automobile industry, greenwashing refers to the misleading of customers about the environmental perks of vehicles by exaggerating efficiency or environmental impact reductions in their marketing strategies.
Volkswagen’s “Dieselgate” scandal was one such instance, where Volkswagen marketed their diesel cars as clean diesel (eco-friendly), by using software to cheat emission tests. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) found out that the software could sense when the vehicle was undergoing testing and activated tools to decrease emissions.
The working of software in the scandal
Energy Industry
In the energy industry, greenwashing is when companies claim to be environmentally friendly by using renewable energy sources while heavily relying on fossil fuels.
ExxonMobil advocates for investments in renewable energy, but they have faced backlash for focusing on fossil fuel extraction and opposition to climate regulations. They have not committed to a net-zero goal in line with the Paris Agreement. Their goals for 2025 have been deemed insufficient for not meeting the Paris goals and failing to address the majority of their climate impacts, including Scope 3 emissions.
Food Industry
In the food industry, greenwashing refers to companies making misleading claims about their products, while ignoring sustainability issues in their supply chain.
Prominent brands like Nestle and Coca-Cola have been accused of misleading eco-friendly claims regarding their plastic bottles being “100% recycled”. According to Client Earth, one of the environmental groups to issue a legal complaint, these claims are “vague, factually incorrect or not substantiated, and may suggest that bottles can be recycled in an infinite circular loop, which is simply not true.”
It is believed that single-use plastic is not sustainable as it cannot be recycled 100%, and recycling can never make up for the volume of plastic produced.
Cosmetics Industry
Greenwashing in the cosmetic industry revolves around throwing away marketing jargon like “natural” or “eco-friendly” without any factual evidence to back the claim with.
L’Oréal has a collection of products under “L’Oréal Paris Botanicals” which are made of natural ingredients and eco-friendly packaging. Despite this, critics argue that L’Oréal relies heavily on plastic packaging and questionable sourcing practices and hence, their overall environmental impact is significant. Even the Botanicals range, while emphasizing on natural ingredients, may still contain synthetic chemicals and packaging that leads to more waste.
L’Oréal’s natural and eco-friendly range of products
Consumer Goods Industry
According to an analysis by McKinsey, consumer package goods that make ESG claims have seen a cumulative growth of 28% over the last five years, as compared to the 20% for products with no such claims. Greenwashing in the industry occurs when companies overstate the environmental features of their products without any evidence or transparency.
Procter & Gamble (P&G) decided not to commit to a corporate policy that banned buying wood pulp from degraded forests. Earlier, in 2021, P&G promised not to allow forest degradation, meaning activities that cause harm to drinking water, animal habitats, or other essential components of the forests.
Airline Industry
Greenwashing occurs in the airline industry when airlines make misleading claims about their carbon offset programs or other environmental practices, all the while continuing to make a significant impact on greenhouse gas emissions.
A lawsuit was initiated against Delta Airlines in 2023, alleging that the airline was overly dependent on the carbon offset market and falsely portraying itself as “the world’s first carbon-neutral airline.” The plaintiffs say that because of these supposed lies of being carbon neutral, they ended up buying the tickets for Delta Airlines at a price higher than they should have.
Banking Industry
In the banking industry, greenwashing occurs when financial institutions advertise “green” financial products or sustainability initiatives, even as they finance industries that are harmful to the environment.
Wells Fargo is one such financial institution that has been criticized for emphasizing on green financial products while investing in industries like fossil fuels and deforestation that contributes to environmental degradation.
Real Estate Industry
In the real estate industry, greenwashing is when misleading claims regarding the sustainability or environmental performance of buildings or developments without substantiating these claims with credible evidence.
A lot of real estate developers market their buildings as sustainable by obtaining LEED certification, but the environmental performance might not match the standards they claim.
Furniture Industry
Some furniture companies engage in greenwashing by falsely promoting the environmental benefits of their products, like claiming to use eco-friendly materials or methods.
Furniture company IKEA advocates for sustainability programs but sources wood from questionable sources and adds to deforestation in certain areas.
Fashion Industry
Greenwashing in fashion occurs when brands make unsubstantiated claims regarding the sustainability of their clothing lines or practices, with no attention towards environmental impacts of fast fashion and poor labor practices. For more detailed analysis on greenwashing in the fashion industry, refer to our blog post here.
H&M’s “Conscious Collection” talks about sustainable fashion, but the fast fashion culture contributes significantly to textile waste and unsustainable consumption patterns.
Motivations behind Greenwashing
Companies resort to greenwashing in order to profit from the growing interest of consumers in eco-friendly products. By portraying themselves as environmentally friendly, they seek to draw in eco-conscious buyers, boost their brand perception, and outshine their rivals, sometimes without altering their practices significantly.
Attracting Eco-Conscious Consumers
Since people have become more conscious of environmental concerns, there is a growing preference for products that are eco-friendly. Some companies are using greenwashing to cater to this market by making their products appear more sustainable than they truly are.
Enhancing Brand Image
Companies get involved in greenwashing to boost their public image and appear more socially conscious. This helps them foster goodwill among customers and stakeholders, even if their actual environmental efforts are less strong than they claim.
Competitive Advantage
Naturally, with an enhanced brand image, companies gain a competitive advantage over other companies in the market. This can lead to customer loyalty and increased market share.
Meeting Regulatory and Investor Expectations
Investors and regulatory bodies are increasingly urging companies to implement sustainable practices. Greenwashing gives these companies an impression of compliance and social responsibility without making any big operational changes.
Cost Savings
Authentic sustainability requires a substantial amount of investment. But with greenwashing, companies get an image of being environmentally conscious without any costs for implementing real environmental change.
Mitigating Negative Publicity
Some companies go for greenwashing to mask their negative environmental impact. By emphasizing small green projects, they draw attention away from the larger environmental damage they’re causing.
How does Greenwashing work?
Businesses overstate their environmental credentials through plenty of strategies, often masking practices that are far from sustainable.
Vague Terminology
Many companies use vague, general terms that sound environmentally friendly but don’t have a clear, precise meaning. Words such as “green,” “natural,” “eco-friendly,” and “sustainable” can be used without standardized definitions or regulatory supervision, making them easy to manipulate.
A cosmetic product might be labeled as “natural” without explaining what that actually means. This lets companies use synthetic chemicals while targeting eco-conscious shoppers.
False or Misleading Claims
Companies spread misinformation about the environmental benefits of their products or services. This includes making exaggerated claims about conserving resources, reducing emissions, or using sustainable materials.
British Petroleum (BP) initiated a campaign “Beyond Petroleum” hinting at a major move towards renewable energy and sustainability. However, BP kept pouring money into oil and gas exploration and production. Their spending on renewable energy was minimal as compared to their overall budget, with the bulk of their focus still on fossil fuels.
Selective Disclosure
Companies usually draw attention to their minor eco-friendly practices, but they tend to overlook the larger impact of their actions. This gives the impression that they are dedicated to the environment, but in reality, there’s so much to be done.
Coca-Cola promotes recycling and reducing waste through campaigns like “World Without Waste”. However, they are one of the largest producers of plastic waste globally and has been criticized for insufficient use of recycled materials in its packaging.
Irrelevant Claims
Companies make claims of sustainability, highlighting an environmental feature, that adds no value or positive impact on the environment. It is not significant or relevant to the product.
Various products are promoted as “CFC-Free” when CFCs have been banned for decades. This claim does not have any additional effort towards sustainability and is glorified to mislead customers.
Hidden Trade-offs
Companies promote a particular aspect of a product as environmentally friendly while concealing another aspect of the same product that harms the environment. This way, they mislead the overall impression of a product’s sustainability.
A paper company would promote the sourcing of their raw materials from sustainably managed forests but fail to disclose the extensive water and chemical usage involved in the paper production process.
Use of Imagery and Colors
The use of visual elements like green color, nature images, or eco-symbols is also a form to greenwash consumers. It creates a connection with environmental friendliness, even if the product is not sustainable.
A bottled water may use images of nature and green packaging, while contributing to plastic pollution and water resource depletion.
Endorsements and Certifications
A lot of times companies use certifications or endorsements that are either unverified, self-created, or from organizations with low standards. A company might create its own “eco-friendly” label or use a certification from a non-reputable organization to showcase sustainability, even if the criteria for the label may not be stringent.
The Negative Impact of Greenwashing
Consumer Mistrust
When consumers realize they have been greenwashed, they will lose faith in sustainability claims, in general. This will further disrupt their trust and build skepticism for genuinely sustainable companies to gain customer support.
Not just that, constant practices of greenwashing will erode consumers’ trust in environmental marketing as a whole, hindering any sort of market-driven environmental improvements.
Damage to Genuine Sustainability Efforts
Since consumers won’t pay heed to genuine sustainability efforts because of greenwashing, companies will not receive the deserved recognition. Greenwashing weakens the influence of truly sustainable practices.
Hindrance to Environmental Progress
With companies engaging in greenwashing, the progress toward genuine sustainability is slowed down by distracting from the real environmental issues at hand. Necessary investments are neglected and companies opt for superficial changes.
Regulatory and Legal Consequences
Companies that engage in greenwashing are prone to regulatory and legal action against them. False or misleading environmental claims can lead to fines, penalties, and damage to the company’s reputation.
Detecting Greenwashing Red Flags
Vague Claims
Be cautious of companies using general terms like “green,” “natural,” “eco-friendly,” and “sustainable” without any clear explanation or evidence to back these terms. Valid claims should always be specific and substantiated.
Lack of Transparency
Companies, that are dedicated to environmental sustainability, are usually transparent in their actions. Visit the company’s website for detailed information, like reports on their environmental impact, sourcing practices, and sustainability goals.
Absence of Third-Party Certifications
Reputable third-party certifications can provide credibility to a company’s sustainability efforts. Look for certifications from reputable organizations such as Energy Star, USDA Organic, Fair Trade, and LEED. Be cautious of self-created or dubious certifications.
Use of Buzzwords
Watch out for the use of too much green, nature themes, and eco-friendly terms in the marketing of products. These visual and linguistic cues can create a misleading impression of environmental responsibility.
Tips to Prevent Greenwashing
Look for certifications
Look for labels that a company can prove, such as Fair Trade, LEED, Carbon Neutral, or Energy Star. Certifications are the common feature, which are provided by the third parties to be transparent.
Read the Fine Print
It is also important to note that there is nothing as Pipeline appearances, natural, green, or eco-friendly. Check these statements with facts about the product’s sustainability aspects including material used, manufacturing process, and the ecological footprint.
Research the Brand
Check the tendencies of a company /industry as a whole rather than segregating it per product type. For instance, if a company comes up with a ‘green’ product but proceeds to shop for materials in environmentally destructive ways, then the company must be involved in greenwashing.
Assess Transparency
It is important to note that if a company is sincere about its sustainability approach, it can disclose accurate information on sustainable practices. Some companies such as Reformation present an annual sustainability report.
Educate Yourself
It also helps to keep updated with respect to sustainability policies and standards, certifications, and potential instances of greenwashing. The more information you have, the more obvious it is to discern fake news.
What About Carbon Trail?
If you’ve read this far and are determined to cut down on your carbon emissions, Carbon Trail is the perfect solution for you! At Carbon Trail, we are committed to helping the fashion and retail industry measure their corporate and product impact using primary supply chain data. Our software streamlines the process of product life-cycle assessment (LCA), making it quick and simple for any fashion product.
Explore our platform’s full range of features, which includes thorough emission measurement across all three Scopes of the GHG Protocol. Our reporting aligns with global frameworks like CDP, GRI, and TCFD, along with European standards such as CSRD.
Click here to discover more about Carbon Trail and how we can assist you in lowering your carbon footprint.
Conclusion
To sum up, greenwashing is a persistent issue in today’s marketplace, with many companies resorting to misleading strategies to seem more eco-friendly than they actually are.
To effectively tackle greenwashing, consumers must utilize a range of crucial methods. It’s important to go beyond labels and ambiguous terms such as “green,” “eco-friendly,” or “natural,” which may not have clear definitions or third-party certifications. Companies should be transparent about their practices. Choose brands that offer thorough sustainability reports and openly share their environmental efforts.
Consumers must also prioritize educating themselves and researching a company’s overall environmental record before deciding to invest in their products or services. Together, consumers can play an instrumental role in building a more sustainable future by demanding transparency and accountability from companies as well as supporting sustainable brands dedicated to the environment. Advocating for genuine sustainability and making informed choices will go a long way in contributing to a healthier planet.
